Yonah, It’s More Than Just A Silly Name

by James R. Stoup Dec 02, 2005

If you navigate over to anandtech.com you can read their review of a prerelease version of Intel’s new “Yonah” chipset. It makes for an interesting read, assuming of course that you are really into learning about processors. However, if, on the off chance that isn’t your specialty I will summarize some of the more relevant points and try to explain how this news is important to Apple and ultimately to you.

The old processor that is currently in use for laptops is the Pentium M (code name Dothan). This is a single core architecture that, while functional, can’t really compete with the Pentium 4 or equivalent AMD chips. Yonah, the replacement for the Pentium M processor, will have two cores instead of one and a revamped system for dealing with memory. This is not just two Pentium Ms welded together, instead this is two cores that have be created to share memory more effectively in addition to lowering power consumption. Now that we have the technical details out of the way, how does this affect you?

Apple Laptops
Chances are very good that the first Mac to be powered by an Intel chip will be a laptop (and of the two models the iBook looks most likely to receive the new chip). To really make the computer effective it needs to excel at three things, speed of performance, multimedia rendering and power consumption.

The speed factor is the most obvious requirement. If the new iBooks aren’t noticeably faster than the old G4 iBooks then sales will slump because consumers won’t see a compelling reason to switch. However, if the new iBooks are running a chip that can hold its own alongside the fastest PC laptops (and thus run faster than the older iBooks as well) then Jobs will have some very nice numbers to show off during his keynote presentation. In short, the speed factor has to be compelling so that Job’s statements from June can be realized as something more than just hype.

The next promising aspect of Yonah is its approach to graphics. The Pentium M had somewhat lackluster performance in this area. Of course, that really didn’t matter too much to your average consumer because Windows doesn’t need too much power in that department. Unless you were a multimedia developer or an avid laptop gamer chances are the Pentium M was good enough. However that isn’t the case for OS X users. We have become quite use to the beautiful Altivec enhanced eye candy of Tiger and have no desire to give it up. What’s more, Leopard will feature even more graphic intensive tricks to dazzle us and that will require a good deal of processing power as well. So once again Yonah looks promising because with this new processor Intel is moving towards making graphic processing a more important feature.

Last we have power consumption. If you will recall Jobs was quick to announce that the benchmark would be changing in the coming years. No longer was the clock speed all important, instead a new standard was to be used based on power and efficiency. For him to really sell that it would be helpful to have a chip that followed that methodology and once again we have Yonah to the rescue.

So, it appears that Yonah is going to be a very promising, very powerful processor. This is good news to anyone who was thinking about purchasing an iBook or Powerbook after the switch to Intel. And, of course, this chipset could be used in the new Mac Mini since a media hum would have several of the same requirements that a laptop would have. Thus I offer this last word of advice, before the next Mac Expo I would suggest buying some stock in Apple. Lots of stock.

Comments

  • I’m excited to the point of being tingly about the advent of Intel Macs.  The future looks very bright for Apple’s hardware.  It seems the company will finally have a chip supplier that actually gives a $^&# about R&D.

    If I actually understood half of the stuff from the anandtech article, I’d probably be even more excited.  I love that site, but sometimes I just have to gloss over the details or I get lost.

    alittlemelty had this to say on Dec 02, 2005 Posts: 2
  • Yonah needs to perform.  It’s as simple as that. 

    The most important factor is that it needs to be faster than the PPCs it replaces.  Power consumption is important, but a visible increase in speed over the PPC version of whatever Mac it goes in is a must, and I think it’s doable. First is the fact that the version of Unix that Apple is using is from the x86 world and Apple might be able to take out some of the programming that made it work with OS X.  Then there is the fact that it is a new, dual core processor.

    In terms of speed, if it is significantly faster in the Mactels than the PPC then I believe that the PB will be released.  Apple can’t have a situation where the iBook is noticeably faster than the PB.  Both could be released, with the PB having a faster chip and if this happens then I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Mac mini released at the same time.

    The fact is that Apple “could” release Mactel versions of all Macs except the PM, depending if they want to start the year with a bang or if they want to be conservative and start with only one Mactel for the vigorous field testing that will take place when Mactels are released in the wild.

    MacKen had this to say on Dec 02, 2005 Posts: 88
  • I too am excited about the Intel switch. More so every day, actually.

    I expect at least iBook and Mini updates. While it would be wise to update the PowerBooks at the same time, that might not sit well with customers. “I just go this thing in October and now it’s already been replaced?!” They could always pump out the PB that was supposed to come out as a quiet upgrade and then switch them to Intel procs in, say, March.

    They can’t switch the iMac, PowerMac or Xserve until Intel offers a 64-bit chip Apple’s happy with. Oh, sure, you could put high clock speed, dual core chips in the iMac, but you’d lose all of the 64-bit enhancements present in OS X. The G5 is still an amazing processor and should be able to hold its own for another year while the switch unfolds.

    Waa had this to say on Dec 02, 2005 Posts: 110
  • First is the fact that the version of Unix that Apple is using is from the x86 world and Apple might be able to take out some of the programming that made it work with OS X.

    Does Darwin x86 already outperform Darwin PPC?

    sjk had this to say on Dec 06, 2005 Posts: 112
  • I too am excited about the Intel switch.  Should make it possible to get a G4 PowerBook really cheap smile

    sburson had this to say on Dec 14, 2005 Posts: 1
  • Page 1 of 1 pages
You need log in, or register, in order to comment